Elderberry Expert Rating and Opinion
The Elderberry Index for Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home is 4.23 out of 5, compared with a national average of 3.81. Three findings stand out as positive.
Things we noticed
Positive standouts
Residents consistently describe respectful, caring staff
100% positive on respect and 100% on caring staff, versus 95.4% and 95.4% across other homes.
Quality measures rating exceeds the national average
5 out of 5, compared with 3.06 across other rated homes in the August 2026 extract.
Following up concerns is above the survey average
100% answered “Always” or “Most of the time”, compared with 84.2% across other homes.
Sources and Explanation
This is a programmatic interpretation of published data, not an in-person inspection or a separate expert-assigned score. The figures are the Elderberry Index and its four government component ratings; a measure the home has no published rating for is left out. Our rating methodology.
Ratings: August 2026. Survey comparisons: 2026 interview responses from that extract. Other Australian homes in the same ratings extract; survey comparisons also require the same interview year. Each eligible home has equal weight; missing/invalid values excluded. These are descriptive comparisons, not resident-weighted or adjusted for differences in care needs.
How findings are selected
Survey gaps of at least 3 percentage points, rating gaps of at least 0.3 stars, and changes of at least 10 percentage points can qualify. These are editorial selection thresholds, not tests of statistical significance. Benchmarks need at least 30 homes. Each side shows up to three eligible findings; missing values never become negative findings. Specific combined food evidence and sustained care-target results are prioritised, then larger differences. Respect and caring are grouped when both qualify.
Food spending uses the My Aged Care sector median for Jan–Mar 2026; resident enjoyment comes from the 2026 survey. The combined finding reports two separate observations from different reporting periods; it does not establish that spending caused the survey result. Year-to-year survey samples may differ and respondent counts are unavailable. Care consistency uses the latest four submitted, quality-checked care-minute records and direct RN minutes without EN top-up.
A lower compliance rating is a comparison with other homes, not a claim of an active sanction. Higher expenditure alone is not treated as better care. Unadjusted clinical incident measures are not used to rank quality here.
My Aged Care home profile · Government Star Ratings extract
Benchmark populations
| Measure | Mean | Other homes |
|---|---|---|
| Elderberry Index | 3.81 | 2365 |
| Residents’ experience | 3.62 | 2434 |
| Compliance | 4.83 | 2395 |
| Staffing | 3.18 | 2454 |
| Quality measures | 3.06 | 2456 |
| Respectful treatment | 95.35% | 1080 |
| Feeling safe | 96.24% | 1080 |
| How well the home is run | 88.07% | 1080 |
| Getting needed care | 94.42% | 1080 |
| Confidence in staff skills | 89.08% | 1080 |
| Encouragement to stay independent | 87.15% | 1079 |
| Staff explaining things | 80.24% | 1078 |
| Enjoying the food | 67.34% | 1080 |
| Following up concerns | 84.20% | 1079 |
| Kind and caring staff | 95.41% | 1080 |
| Having a say in daily life | 92.70% | 1080 |
How much care and nursing does Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home provide?
Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home reported 217 minutes of care per resident per day in January to March 2026, 17 minutes above its target of 200 minutes. Registered nurses provided 41 of those minutes, 1 minute above the registered-nurse target of 40.
In one of the last four quarters, Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home met both its total and registered-nurse targets. Minutes of care per resident per day ranged from 188 to 217 across those four quarters.
Who provides that care?
Per resident per day, personal care workers provided 176 minutes, followed by registered nurses (41 minutes) and enrolled nurses (1 minute). Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home also reported spending on physiotherapists, podiatrists, speech pathologists, dietitians, and lifestyle and recreation workers in the same quarter.
What is the food like at Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home?
In the 2026 Residents’ Experience Survey, 65% of residents surveyed at Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home said they like the food “always” or “most of the time”, within 3 percentage points of the 67.3% average across other homes. The share fell from 72% in 2025. Another 36% answered “some of the time”, and none answered “never”.
In January to March 2026, Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home spent $10 per resident per day on food, 38% below the sector median of $16. Spending on dietitians in the same quarter was $0.64 per resident per day, 129% above the sector median of $0.28.
How are meals prepared?
According to Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home, breakfast, lunch and dinner are all cooked fresh. All meals are prepared on site.
Do residents enjoy the food?
Residents who answered “Always” or “Most of the time”.
65% of surveyed residents
Spending & preparation
Daily spending on food and dietitian services, and how meals are prepared.
Sources and Explanation
What do residents say about Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home?
Asked in the 2026 Residents’ Experience Survey whether staff follow up when they raise things, 100% of residents surveyed at Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home answered “always” or “most of the time”, 15.8 percentage points above the average of 84.2% across other homes. When residents were asked whether staff explain things to them (93% against 80.2%) and whether the home is well run (100% against 88.1%), answers were also above the average for other homes.
At Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home, answers were at least 3 percentage points above the average for other homes on all 10 questions other than food.
Do residents feel safe and get the care they need?
When residents surveyed at Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home were asked whether they feel safe, 86% answered “always” and 14% “most of the time”. When asked whether they get the care they need, 79% answered “always” and 21% “most of the time”.
Do residents have a say in daily life?
For choice and independence, the share of “always” or “most of the time” answers at Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home was 100% when asked whether they have a say in their daily activities and 93% when asked whether they are encouraged to do as much as possible for themselves.
How does Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home spend on resident care?
Total spending at Little Sisters of the Poor Glendalough Home in the 2024–25 financial year was $414.44 per resident per day, and care and nursing made up 59.4% of it. Care and nursing spending of $246.28 was 7% below the sector median of $264.85. These amounts are the home’s costs, not the fees a resident pays.
Where does the rest of the spending go?
Other categories included administration ($45.27), accommodation and maintenance ($43.63), and cleaning and laundry ($33.02) per resident per day. Within care and nursing, the largest amounts per resident per day went to personal care workers and assistants in nursing ($146.64) and registered nurses ($56.80).
